Of Zealots and Refuge: What perspective can our tradition offer on the verdict in the George Zimmerman trial?

Our tradition sometimes speaks to us in a still, small voice. In a passage from the prophets, God illustrates to the prophet Elijah, Eliyahu HaNavi, where to find God’s presence. God creates a furious wind, but God is not in the wind. God then creates an earthquake, but God is not in the earthquake. God then creates a fire, but God is not in the fire. After the fire, there was a Kol D’mamah Dakah, a still, small voice.

I hear and feel that Kol D’mamah Dakah, that still small voice, stirring within me when something resonates with me in a Jewish way. It’s telling me to pay attention, to consider carefully, to try to reach some new understanding based on Jewish teaching.

This week the Kol D’mamah Dakah stirred with the verdict in the George Zimmerman trial. How am I to understand this terrible tragedy and the complicated national emotional response from a Jewish perspective?

While there are so many aspects in which this is a difficult story of murder, racial profiling and racial tension and so many questions about the nature of human behavior, the Kol D’mamah Dakah, the Jewish perspective within me has been stirred by trying to determine what to think about two things: George Zimmerman and Stand your Ground Legislation.

If we view George Zimmerman as a zealot, one who is uncompromising in his ideals and willing to act upon them in this case to a violent end, what might we learn from our sacred texts about how to understand the situation? There are many examples of zealotry in our tradition. The prophet Elijah whose story I quoted earlier; Matityahu the Maccabee; and Pinhas. We just read about and studied Pinhas a few weeks ago, his story arrives in Torah near the end of the book of Numbers. The Israelites, still camped in the desert were associating themselves with Moabite women, and God through Moses ordered that the men who consort with Moabite women are to be killed. Upon hearing this order, Moses and the other leaders of the Israelite community wept and sat paralyzed in confusion at the edge of the camp. Pinhas, however, took it upon himself to carry out the order, and he killed the next Israelite man and his Moabite companion that walked together before him. He murdered them. Yet, astonishingly, God rewards Pinhas. God offer Pinhas a Brit Shalom, a covenant of peace, and anoints him the head of the priestly class. God’s wish, which was the law, was on the books. Pinhas in his actions did carry out God’s will. Was God’s will just? Can we question the decree, just as the other leaders of the community who sat weeping at the edge of the camp did? Should we quarrel with the concept of a reward for such behavior? Yes. But the commentators in our tradition wanted to try to understand this Brit Shalom and why God would offer it to a murderer. Why make an example of Pinhas?

The 19th century commentator the Netziv said the Brit Shalom, the covenant of peace, is one of healing. Who needs to be healed? Pinhas. He was violent, he killed both a man and a woman, there would be those who would want to seek revenge, and Pinhas, the zealot, needs to heal. When I think of George Zimmerman, I see that zealot, taking his fear to violent ends and hiding behind the law. Zealots exist, our tradition tells us, and they must be healed of their zealotry, they must not believe that taking matters into their own hands is proper behavior.

And what about that law Zimmerman hid behind, what would our tradition make of Stand Your Ground Legislation and the elimination of the necessity to retreat when you are faced with an aggressor? Again, we read recently in Parashat Masei about the Cities of Refuge. Torah provides law to guard against avenging the murders of loved ones and killing the murderers by creating cities to where the guilty may escape and live undisturbed. Known perpetrators are allowed to retreat because Torah acknowledges the human will to strike revenge is real and strong and must be legislated against, so the avengers don’t put themselves in the position to murder as well. If so much effort is paid to protecting those who have already murdered, it follows in my mind that it would also be necessary to make an effort to protect those who are perceived as threatening. Why? So you don’t put yourself in the position to murder. Don’t stand your ground, don’t attack. Our tradition teaches we must allow all to seek refuge.

The Kol D’mamah Dakah within me is also stirred this week by the words of the prophet Isaiah in this week’s Haftarah. We call this Shabbat Shabbat Nachamu, the Shabbat of comfort. It is the first Shabbat after Tisha B’Av, when we recalled the pain of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem and the beginning of the exile. Isaiah offers hope and consolation. We too, faced with a national moment such as this, must look for hope and comfort, and pray and work for healing of our nation after the needless death of a young person and in the reality of ongoing racial tension and injustice in our society. We must look for hope and comfort, and pray and work for a world without zealots and with the eternal safety of refuge.

When we have no answers yet feel stirred, we hear the words of the prophet Isaiah echoing this week, “Comfort, comfort my people, says the Eternal. You have suffered enough.” So often we say “Enough.” May hope and progress triumph.

8 Responses to Of Zealots and Refuge: What perspective can our tradition offer on the verdict in the George Zimmerman trial?

  1. Rabbi Jill Maderer says:

    President Obama’s remarks delivered just hours before Cantor Frankel’s beautiful D’var Torah: http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/full-text-president-obama-s-remarks-on-trayvon-martin-20130719

  2. Dear Cantor Erin Frankel ,

    You write and speak words of truth .

    My own evaluation of the murder of Trevon Martin : a tragedy based on unbridled TRIBALISM and XENOPHOBIA .

    We are all born tribal : it can be a blessing and/or a curse.

    We all have a tendency to xenophobia ; this , too, can be a blessing or a curse.

    We are all TRIBAL
    We all have a tendency to fear THE OTHER

    We all grow up in a nuclear family > extended family > neighborhood > village/town/city > nation .
    This familiarity can be our human comfort zone .

    Tribalism can be a blessing when we make connections ,
    and work for the common good .

    Tribalism can be a curse when we let it lead to xenophobia : fear of strangers .
    A stranger need not be an enemy ; we all share a common humanity .

    It is a great Mitzvah to turn a Stranger into a Friend .

  3. Mark Peaceman says:

    The unnecessary and tragic death of a teenager is at least in part the consequence of “stand your ground’ laws. They essentially authorize vigilantism. These laws must be repealed before someone else is needlessly killed.

    • Lyn Linker says:

      Mr. Peaceman-
      I partially agree with you, but not totally. The “stand your ground” laws were originally written so that if I am attacked or my house is broken into I cannot be arrested and prosecuted for defending my self and my property. That was clearly NOT the case in the Zimmerman/Martin case. The laws need to be clarified so that Zimmerman would have been held accountable for Martin’s death but that neither you nor I(nor any law-abiding citizen) will face criminal charges for defending him/her self and/or his or her property. Of course, if Zimmerman had stayed in his car as the 911 dispatcher had told him to, this would be q non-issue and Martin would still be alive!

  4. Mark Peaceman says:

    More than clarification is needed. A neighborhood watchman carrying a concealed weapon fatally shot an unarmed teen. No initial arrest due to a self defense claim. Jury ultimately acquits. Zimmerman family refers to Travon Martin’s death as unfortunate. Gun control and stand your ground laws need our immediate attention. Further, if anyone actually believes that there is no racial component to these events and outcome, they are delusional.

    • Lyn Linker says:

      Mr. Peaceman,
      I totally agree with you that there was a racial component to the actions taken by Zimmerman. I am not sure about the racial component to the acquital-one of the jurors stated to a morning news show(maybe ABC but I am not sure) that the way the law is written and the evidence offered by the prosection left the jury with no choice but to acquit. I beleiev her-many years ago my late father served on a jury. He said the entire jury knew the defendent was guilty of the crime but that the prosecutor hadn’t proven it beyond a resonable doubt so they had to let the suspect go. My dad was not surprised to see the man’s picture in the paper less than a year later being arrested for the same type of crime.
      I also agree with you that there needs to be much better gun control in this country.
      Perhaps “clarification” was the wrong word to use in my original reply to you but I couldn’t think of a better word. The original intent, as I stated, was to protect a person from criminal charges if they defended themselves and /or their property from a criminal. This was NOT the case in the Zimmerman/Martin case. Had Zimmerman done what the 911 dispatcher told him, which was to stay in the car, we would not be having this discussion.
      By the way, do you or anyone else reading this blog know if Zimmerman was even authorized to carry a concealed weapon? I am guessing yes, only because I read nothing to the contrary, but I don’t know for sure.
      Respectfully submitted
      Perhaps “clarification” was the wrong word to use in my original reply to you but I couldn’t think of a better word. As I stated I do not believe Zimmerman’s actions fell under “stand your ground”, at least not as it is intended. As a single woman living alone I have enough to worry about-I don’t need to worry about getting arrested because I defended my self and/or my home from a criminal. I believe “stand your ground” is to protect real cases of self defense. As stated in my original reply to you, Zimmerman didn’t fall under this. Had he done what the 911 dispatcher told him to do, which was to stay in his vehicle, Martin would still be alive.
      Perhaps “clarification” was the wrong word to use in my original reply to you.
      P
      Perhaps I should not
      I

      • Lyn Linker says:

        Mr Peaceman-I obviously had trouble with my computer when I posted the above reply! Please ignore everything after “Martin would still be alive”. Thank you.
        Respectfully submitted, Lyn Linker

  5. Mark Peaceman says:

    Thank you for your response. Yes, Zimmerman had a permit for the weapon involved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: